From the beginning of all the events with ISIS, Obama refuses to define the United States being at war in a religious war with ISOL. Instead Obama defines each individual event as a separate event of a violent crime, refusing to identify the United Sates as being in a religious war with ISIS.
Obama is manipulating the English language to avoid identifying ISIS as the enemy and the Obama administration turning this into a social experiment In an interview with Marie Harf, Chris Matthews from MSNBC extracts the plan of the Obama Administration to defeat ISIS.
MATTHEWS: Are we killing enough of them?
HARF: We’re killing a lot of them and we’re going to keep killing more of them. So are the Egyptians, so are the Jordanians. They’re in this fight with us. But we cannot win this war by killing them. We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it’s lack of opportunity for jobs, whether —
MATTHEWS: We’re not going to be able to stop that in our lifetime or fifty lifetimes. There’s always going to be poor people. There’s always going to be poor Muslims, and as long as there are poor Muslims, the trumpet’s blowing and they’ll join. We can’t stop that, can we?
HARF: We can work with countries around the world to help improve their governance. We can help them build their economies so they can have job opportunities for these people…
The Obama administration needs to get back to the basics of war instead of turning war into a social experiment. The basics of winning a war is to identify the enemy, infiltrate and defeat the enemy. It is not the job of the United States of try to reform other countries. It is simply impossible to try to change their ideology or fix their problems. ISIS fighters are brainwashed into believing Christians are sinners and Islamic Extremism no matter how brutal is the right way to live. Their objective to destroy, conquer and rule. There is no reforming the Islamic Extremism ideology.